<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash vs Javascript (jQuery) Pros and Cons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://logicpool.com/archives/30/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://logicpool.com/archives/30</link>
	<description>Web Designers &#38; Developers Resource</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:23:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://logicpool.com/archives/30/comment-page-1#comment-1765</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logicpool.com/?p=30#comment-1765</guid>
		<description>google spiders crawl through flash content ....   so ur websites will be searched during a search.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>google spiders crawl through flash content &#8230;.   so ur websites will be searched during a search&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://logicpool.com/archives/30/comment-page-1#comment-1764</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logicpool.com/?p=30#comment-1764</guid>
		<description>see everywhere u see u see posts like javascript wil leave behind flash.....

but the point is 
that if adobe stops developing flash then in maybe after 5-6 years so javascript will catch up........

we always see --  make flash like rotate effect in javascript and they will give whole chunks of code....

but believe me it flash is way ahead in its technology right now and will be ahead in the future</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see everywhere u see u see posts like javascript wil leave behind flash&#8230;..</p>
<p>but the point is<br />
that if adobe stops developing flash then in maybe after 5-6 years so javascript will catch up&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>we always see &#8212;  make flash like rotate effect in javascript and they will give whole chunks of code&#8230;.</p>
<p>but believe me it flash is way ahead in its technology right now and will be ahead in the future</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abhinav</title>
		<link>http://logicpool.com/archives/30/comment-page-1#comment-1763</link>
		<dc:creator>abhinav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logicpool.com/?p=30#comment-1763</guid>
		<description>@Nick :Even if you are good with flash, you still have to use javascript to retrieve values from objects in flash.


sir with all due respect ....  have u gone mad....

what are u saying...   with flash u can directly send values to php there is no javascript involve anywhere......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nick :Even if you are good with flash, you still have to use javascript to retrieve values from objects in flash.</p>
<p>sir with all due respect &#8230;.  have u gone mad&#8230;.</p>
<p>what are u saying&#8230;   with flash u can directly send values to php there is no javascript involve anywhere&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andre rossio</title>
		<link>http://logicpool.com/archives/30/comment-page-1#comment-1762</link>
		<dc:creator>andre rossio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logicpool.com/?p=30#comment-1762</guid>
		<description>flash       ---       ill go with flash anyday........
                         with as3 its developer heaven
                          code is really neat
                      u can think outside of the box with flash and do ur  anim so easily in like 5 min. while same anim in Javascript takes a lot of time....    and probably ull end up searching internet for some hack to do it..... or some prewritten code by another developer......

and 95% people hav flash so its not a matter of availability...   so people who open internet once in a while also have flash.............

crashing.... flash does not crash i have been working for 10 years on flash and javascript and i have never seen it crashing........   

what else size....    believe size is way to smaller in flash as it uses vector  so if u wanna have a black translucent box behind your text for    anim.  you dont need a png (about 80 kb) while flash will do it in 1kb

and have u guys seen javascript anim its jittery so unprofessional  .....     


really i find flash is better than javascript in all ways and its a worthy one time investment........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>flash       &#8212;       ill go with flash anyday&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
                         with as3 its developer heaven<br />
                          code is really neat<br />
                      u can think outside of the box with flash and do ur  anim so easily in like 5 min. while same anim in Javascript takes a lot of time&#8230;.    and probably ull end up searching internet for some hack to do it&#8230;.. or some prewritten code by another developer&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>and 95% people hav flash so its not a matter of availability&#8230;   so people who open internet once in a while also have flash&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>crashing&#8230;. flash does not crash i have been working for 10 years on flash and javascript and i have never seen it crashing&#8230;&#8230;..   </p>
<p>what else size&#8230;.    believe size is way to smaller in flash as it uses vector  so if u wanna have a black translucent box behind your text for    anim.  you dont need a png (about 80 kb) while flash will do it in 1kb</p>
<p>and have u guys seen javascript anim its jittery so unprofessional  &#8230;..     </p>
<p>really i find flash is better than javascript in all ways and its a worthy one time investment&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarbantin bookstore</title>
		<link>http://logicpool.com/archives/30/comment-page-1#comment-1566</link>
		<dc:creator>tarbantin bookstore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 06:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logicpool.com/?p=30#comment-1566</guid>
		<description>I prefer to use javascript instead of flash in my bookstore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer to use javascript instead of flash in my bookstore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad</title>
		<link>http://logicpool.com/archives/30/comment-page-1#comment-1540</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 07:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logicpool.com/?p=30#comment-1540</guid>
		<description>I agree with Professor Josh that there should be a browser and other capabilities to make both functions work with less stress on your computer. If they can make double core and quad core and compressed files then it should also be available for simple animations.

Now when it comes to animation I believe Flash has more capabilities than JQuery as far as customization. Jquery may be good for galleries and up and down movements but for the real animation Flash is King, not to mention other 3 D rendering tools. I believe both Flash and Jquery can be merged into one application and that would be awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Professor Josh that there should be a browser and other capabilities to make both functions work with less stress on your computer. If they can make double core and quad core and compressed files then it should also be available for simple animations.</p>
<p>Now when it comes to animation I believe Flash has more capabilities than JQuery as far as customization. Jquery may be good for galleries and up and down movements but for the real animation Flash is King, not to mention other 3 D rendering tools. I believe both Flash and Jquery can be merged into one application and that would be awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://logicpool.com/archives/30/comment-page-1#comment-1345</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 14:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logicpool.com/?p=30#comment-1345</guid>
		<description>Flash is made for 3D rendering and video gaming, not for creating websites. Javascript is the way to enhance a web site and is much easier due to the community.

Even if you are good with flash, you still have to use javascript to retrieve values from objects in flash.

Jquery, in all its glory, its glorified javascript. I never saw the power in using a function that already exists and rewording it to sound as jquery makes it sound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flash is made for 3D rendering and video gaming, not for creating websites. Javascript is the way to enhance a web site and is much easier due to the community.</p>
<p>Even if you are good with flash, you still have to use javascript to retrieve values from objects in flash.</p>
<p>Jquery, in all its glory, its glorified javascript. I never saw the power in using a function that already exists and rewording it to sound as jquery makes it sound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://logicpool.com/archives/30/comment-page-1#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 15:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logicpool.com/?p=30#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>I have been in the web business a long time, and I have been teaching web design, animation, programming for a long time.  

I am still amazed at this discussion and lack of overall global thinking on the technologies we use.  The browser based experience was created page by page because of our slow connections and need to break data down for ease of access.  

with data rates increasing, so should our experience and the bloat and overall repetative data we send over the internet for page by page surfing is ridiculous. 

We continue to extend a terrible system such as a tag based language just because that is what we all feel comfortable with, adding javascript, plugins for flash, both parties are all to blame.

big picture is we should have a browser and an experience that is fully OOP and backed by a full high level language period.  

I would like to see a high level language system like flash&#039;s abilities embedded right into the browser.  Google is working on doing this with chrome I believe.

The old days of page by page traversing on the web are gone, or should be, and we need to realize the potential of the web and how to best utilize our speeds.  What&#039;s 500kb anymore with our speeds when you can have the entire site there at your fingertips locally.  You would rather go through 10 pages of 80kb downloads?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been in the web business a long time, and I have been teaching web design, animation, programming for a long time.  </p>
<p>I am still amazed at this discussion and lack of overall global thinking on the technologies we use.  The browser based experience was created page by page because of our slow connections and need to break data down for ease of access.  </p>
<p>with data rates increasing, so should our experience and the bloat and overall repetative data we send over the internet for page by page surfing is ridiculous. </p>
<p>We continue to extend a terrible system such as a tag based language just because that is what we all feel comfortable with, adding javascript, plugins for flash, both parties are all to blame.</p>
<p>big picture is we should have a browser and an experience that is fully OOP and backed by a full high level language period.  </p>
<p>I would like to see a high level language system like flash&#8217;s abilities embedded right into the browser.  Google is working on doing this with chrome I believe.</p>
<p>The old days of page by page traversing on the web are gone, or should be, and we need to realize the potential of the web and how to best utilize our speeds.  What&#8217;s 500kb anymore with our speeds when you can have the entire site there at your fingertips locally.  You would rather go through 10 pages of 80kb downloads?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://logicpool.com/archives/30/comment-page-1#comment-1320</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 05:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logicpool.com/?p=30#comment-1320</guid>
		<description>One of the main issues with Flash is that it has an enourmous negative impact on the process of getting your site ranked by the major search engines. If you follow SEO boards time and time again you see people posting with queries about why their flash-based sites are performing so badly - it&#039;s because robots can&#039;t read the flash-based content on the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the main issues with Flash is that it has an enourmous negative impact on the process of getting your site ranked by the major search engines. If you follow SEO boards time and time again you see people posting with queries about why their flash-based sites are performing so badly &#8211; it&#8217;s because robots can&#8217;t read the flash-based content on the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jQuery</title>
		<link>http://logicpool.com/archives/30/comment-page-1#comment-1302</link>
		<dc:creator>jQuery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 19:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logicpool.com/?p=30#comment-1302</guid>
		<description>[...] article on &#8220;Flash vrs Javascript (jQuery) Pros and Cons&#8221; has a pretty good summary of the comparison between the two.  (via CoDrops &amp; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] article on &#8220;Flash vrs Javascript (jQuery) Pros and Cons&#8221; has a pretty good summary of the comparison between the two.  (via CoDrops &amp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
